The Delusion of Atheisim

December 8th, 2009

Upon seeing an advertisement for a book entitled The God Delusion by noted atheist Richard Dawkins, I decided I wanted to read it. I didn’t want to read it bad enough to pay the $27 charge at the local bookstore so I got it through e-bay for $7.98 (including shipping) from a Goodwill store. Thus not only did I save a lot of money but I also did not increase the sales count of this book!
I’m not sure what I expected when I got the book but I can say that I was disappointed that the author writes more from a biased, antagonistic, egotistical mindset than from a reasonable, intelligent position. That is not to say that the author is not intelligent; he definitely is, and he is arrogantly proud of it.

Now when I received this book in the mail, it should have gone into its proper place in line with the books I am currently reading and planning to read. But, curiosity got the best of me so I have pre-emptively read the Preface already. Here, briefly, is the summary of his 7-page Preface:
1. If you are religious, you are a victim of “childhood indoctrination”.   The author hopes that his book will reach some of this class of people who are still “open-minded”; those whose “childhood indoctrination…didn’t ‘take’, or whose native intelligence is strong enough to overcome it” (page 6).  Personally, like many, many Christians I know, I wasn’t raised in a church going, Christian home.  My father was an agnostic when I was growing up and I simply believed like he did (i.e.  “if there is a God than why is there war, famine, etc ”).  Thankfully, my father did trust Jesus Christ as his Saviour at age 45 (after I had already become a Christian; would that be “reverse indoctrination”?) and was ready to meet the Lord when he passed from this life.   
2. If you are an atheist, you are enlightened and “among the educated elite” (page 4).  This is the predominant thought process of the atheist; “we don’t believe in God because we are smarter than everybody else”.  Don’t believe this?  “…atheism nearly always indicates a healthy independence of mind and, indeed, a healthy mind” (page 3).  Translated: if you are a Christian you have a mental problem.  Yes, they really believe that!  The puzzling thing is that atheists are not smart enough to realize how smug and intolerant they sound when they stroke their own ego’s like this. 
3.  Religious people are “faith-heads” (page 5) while atheists are “free spirits” (page 6).    “Faith-heads” sounds eerily like “ditto-heads”, which makes me wonder if the author is a closet Rush Limbaugh fan!  This atheist, like most, feels that he is superior because he is a self-proclaimed open-minded free-thinker, which he definitely is not!
 
I’m looking forward to reading the rest of the book so that I can be more intelligently educated on the delusion of atheism.

The King James Revisions

November 24th, 2009

I have been recently using a reprint of the original 1611 King James Bible in my daily reading.  New versions of the Bible are always claiming to be nothing more than “updates” of the old, poetic, Elizabethan English King James Version of 1611.  In their sales pitches they often refer to the fact that the 1611 KJB went through four “revisions” to get to what we hold in our hands today.  So, they claim, we aren’t using a 1611 King James Bible but a 1769 King James Bible.  Here are some things I’ve found in reading an “original” 1611:         

1.  I have had no problem reading the 1611 translation.  Yes, the words are spelled differently, and the type set is different, but the variations are not enough to hinder easy reading.                                 

2.  No words have been updated /modernized from 1611 to 1769, neither have any words been left out.

 3.  No verses have been shortened or omitted through the “revisions”. 

So in the 158 years from 1611 to 1769 the only changes are spelling, type set (from Gothic to Roman) and some capitalization (most notably the word “Church” [1611] to “church” [1769]).  In fact, the four “revisions” (more correctly called “editions”) of the 1611 King James Bible could be briefly described as thus:

                                    1. 1629  correction of earlier printing errors

                                    2.  1638 same as above

                                    3.  1762  standardization of spelling

                                    4.  1769  same as #3

When you look at the dates you see that this is actually just two “revisions” not four.  The correction of printing errors took two efforts to complete as did the standardization of spelling. So then from 1769 to present (240 years), with the above corrections of printing errors and standardization of spelling, there have been no changes whatsoever.

 Compare this to the multiple versions from the Revised Version of 1881 (the first English translation after the King James), to the American Standard Version of 1901, to the Revised Standard Version of 1951, to the New American Standard Version of 1971, to the  New International Version of 1977, to the English Standard Version of 2001, to The Message (an irreverent and blasphemous 2002 translation), and many others.  In them, words are drastically changed, and/or phrases are completely omitted (i.e. “through his blood”-Eph 1:7), and in some, sixteen verses completely disappear (Matt 17:21,18:11, 23:14; Mark 7:16, 9:44,46; 11:26, 15:28; Luke 17:36, 23:17; John 5:4; Acts 8:37, 15:34, 24:7, 28:29; Romans 16:24).   That’s not revision, its robbery!

The Pulpit’s the Problem

November 6th, 2009

The following quote is attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville, a French historian most widely known for his 2-volume set, Democracy in America (1835, 1840):
“I sought for the key to the greatness and genius of America in her harbors…; in her fertile fields and boundless forests; in her rich mines and vast world commerce; in her public school system and institutions of learning. I sought for it in her democratic Congress and in her matchless Constitution.
Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power.
America is great because America is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.”

This historians observation for the greatness of America was that in her churches the ”pulpits flame with righteousness”.   America’s early churches were not “seeker sensitive”, “contemporary”  or “emerging”.  They weren’t designed for social activities or entertainment.  No praise teams, no electric guitars and drums, no Starbucks in the lobby, no cafe’s in the church.  The thing that brought the people together was fire and brimstone, Holy Ghost-filled, Bible preaching.  In most of our churches today we are losing this, or have already lost it.  You could enter into many churches today and not even need to bring a Bible with you.  The Bible is nothing more than a backdrop for our touchy-feely, sensitive, fleshly, conscience-soothing pleasure.  You can gather many for “Gospel sings” or “concerts” but those same attendee’s would shun an old-fashioned heaven-sent Bible-preaching revival!   The main problem in America today is not our politicians, our courts or our schools; the main problem is our pulpits!

GOD IS JUST

October 20th, 2009

Thomas Jefferson said, “Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever.” (1)

Can you imagine the shock that Jefferson would experience if he were to come back to life today? Just his mention of “God” and His justice would make him politically incorrect! And many of those who hold him in high esteem would incorrectly brand him as a member of the “religious right” and turn against him!

Those with a knowledge of Jefferson and what he stood for know that he would be saddened by our enormously oversized, over-budgeted government with its escalating debt. He would be disappointed in our over-reaching federal judicial system. He would listen in disbelief when we tried to explain to him that the 10 Commandments were forbidden in our courtrooms and schools because he once made reference to a “wall of separation between church and state”! And imagine the bewilderment when he would hear that the Quaran he used to learn about Mussulmen (Muslims) when he was considering going to war against some of them, was used by a Muslim when sworn into office of the United States House of Representatives!(2)

Yes, times have changed since the days of Jefferson. And if he trembled in his day at the thought that “God is just” how much more so should we tremble today?

Psalm 9:7, “The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God”.

(1) Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia (Boston:David Carlisle, 1801) Query XVIII, pg. 241
(2) Congressman Keith Ellison from Minnesota

At Calvary?

August 20th, 2009

Who doesn’t know that the place where the Lord Jesus was crucified for our sins was called “Calvary”? Many song writers obviously knew this: Calvary Covers It All, At Calvary, Burdens Are Lifted At Calvary, Lead Me To Calvary; as well as songs which refer to Calvary (Blessed Redeemer, Victory in Jesus, The Old Rugged Cross). But what is the source of the identification and name of this place? It is Luke 23:33, “And when they were come to the place, which is called Calvary, there they crucified him”. No problem, right? Do you realize that this is the only place in the Bible where the word “Calvary” appears? Still no problem though, God only has to say it once for it to be true!

Here’s the problem:  the only Bible that has the word “Calvary” in Luke 23:33 is the King James Bible.  Again, no problem….if you use a King James Bible.  But if you use ANY other Bible Version the word “Calvary” does not appear!  Do the people that use these other versions believe that Jesus died on Calvary?  Of course.  Do they realize that the Bible they are using has removed “Calvary” from the text?  NO.   ( The same thing is true of the only appearance of the name “Lucifer” in Isaiah 14:12; it’s in the King James, but no others.)

.

RELIGIOUS PLURALITY

July 28th, 2009

Quick!! Name the Founding Father who was a Hindu. O.K., name the Founding Father who was a Buddhist. Times up; name the Founding Father who was a Muslim.  How about a follower of Judaism? A Scientologist, a Mormon, a Jehovah’s Witness (I know, they weren’t around yet but you get the point).

Now, name the Founding Fathers (note the plural) who were of some denomination of Christianity and/or used the Christian Bible (not the Tipitaka, the Bhagavad Gita, the Koran, or the Torah).  So where does the insistence that our Founding Fathers were of a “religious plurality” come from?  No Hindu’s, no Buddhists, no Muslims; nothing but Christians (so-called atheists/agnostics don’t count, that’s not a faith, that’s foolishness-Psalm 14:1).  Where’s the “religious plurality”?

This is not to suggest that all those of non-Christian beliefs be deported from the United States, or that they be “forced” to convert to Christianity.  This is simply to remember that our blessed country was started with a firm reliance upon the Christian God  (there really is no other-Isaiah 44:8) and the Christian Bible.

RELIGIOUS LIBERTY

July 17th, 2009

John Waller was such a wicked man that he was given the nickname “Swearing Jack”.   He was notorious for his profanity, gambling and other “unbridled inclinations to vice”.  He was the leader among ungodly men and had earned his title as the “devil’s adjutant”.  One day John was called upon as a juryman for the trial of a Baptist preacher, who had been charged with “worshipping God contrary to the laws of the land”.    The year was 1767.

As a result of the trial John Waller trusted Jesus Christ as Saviour and was baptized.  He then began to proclaim the gospel throughout his state of Virginia.    In June of 1768 John Waller was arrested in Spotsylvania, VA along with two other preachers.   The fanciful statement made against them was “these men are great disturbers of the peace, for they cannot meet a man upon the road, but they must ram a text of scripture down his throat”.  Waller and the others were imprisoned  for 43 days.

In November 1770, Waller was preaching in Middlesex, VA when a magistrate attempted to pull him off of a stage, leaving him (Waller) bloodied.  In August 1771 Waller, along with three other preachers, was arrested while preaching and was imprisoned a second time,  in Urbanna, VA.  In Essex County, VA on March 21, 1774 Waller was arrested for “preaching and expounding the Scriptures contrary to law” and fined.  In all, Waller spent 113 days in four different jails in Virginia.  These things happened because the State was united with the Established Church (in this case Anglican/Episcopalian)  in opposing Christian denominations other than their own.

It is because of men like John Waller that we have the religious liberty we have experienced in this great nation.   Though Jefferson and Madison (and others) put down on paper the tenants of our religious freedom, the “footwork” was done by John Waller, James Ireland, Joseph Criag and a number of others.   It was their suffering, because of their faith, that has given us religious liberty.

BIBLEPHOBIA

June 18th, 2009

Many of those who are so quick to accuse others of “phobia’s” are overlooking their own obvious “phobia”.  They would like to think that others have unwarranted phobia’s but that they themselves are free of any irrational fears.  A good example would be those who point a finger at Christian’s whose comprehension of what the Bible says about gays causes them to yell, “homophobia”!  They know that the Bible says, “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind:  it is abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22)  And, “…the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly…” (Romans 1:27) which God calls “vile affections” (verse 26).  There is no doubt as to what the Bible has to say about homosexuality.  This causes the performers and promoters of this “lifestyle” to show their disdain for the Bible.

Example:  the following is a letter written several years ago by an employee of the television station ABC in response to a complaint regarding programming which included homosexuality.

“How about getting your nose out of the Bible (which is ONLY a book of stories compiled by MANY different writers hundreds of years ago) and read the Declaration of Independence (what our nation is built on) where it says “All Men are Created Equal” – and try treating them that way for a change!?  Or better yet, try thinking for yourself and stop using an archaic book of stories as your crutch for your existence.” 

Although this employee was fired and ABC then made a more “politically correct” response to the complainant; this attitude is common among a very vocal minority of people.  This is none other than fear of the Bible, or “Biblephobia”.

CASTING DOUBT

June 12th, 2009

I was recently studying Psalm 62 and was using a reference (commentary) by an author I turn to often. As is normal, we don’t agree on everything but I find his books helpful, especially in sermon structure and outline. Though he puts a strong emphasis on the King James Bible (a.k.a. Authorized Version) he does not believe it to be the infallible word of God, which is obvious in many instances. Let me produce here verse 3 and then show his comments:

“How long will ye imagine mischief against a man? Ye shall be slain all of you: as a bowing wall shall ye be, and as a tottering fence.”

This author then commented: “The Authorized Version prints much of that in italics, indicating that the translators had trouble with it and supplied a number of words to make up what they thought to be the sense. Rotherham renders the verse like this: “How long keep ye rushing at a man, continue crushing, all of you, as at a leaning wall, as at a bulging fence?”

This is disturbing for several reasons: one, the statement that the translators “supplied a number of words to make up what they thought to be the sense” would cause one to think that there were more than 5 out of 28 words in italics. Two, the five words in question refer to who is like a “bowing wall” and a “tottering fence”. In the King James Bible they are David’s enemies, in Rotherham they refer to David himself. Third, if the words in question are the five italicized words why change “bowing wall” to “leaning wall” and change “tottering fence” to “bulging fence” (not to mention “imagine mischief” to rushing at” and “slain” to “continue crushing”). Four, the context of the verse itself defines who is the “bowing wall” and “tottering fence” – “ye” (David’s enemies). Fifth, as usual this correction supposes that one man (Rotherham in this case) has the linguistic knowledge and spiritual insight to override the 47 translators of the King James Bible.

But the most upsetting thing about this is that it subjects the infallible words of the Living God to doubts and questions. Who’s right? Is anybody going to be slain or not? Who is the bowing/tottering wall and tottering/bulging fence? Unintentionally, this author has cast doubt upon the word of God. If this were a rare thing it wouldn’t be worth mentioning but this is done throughout the Bible a multitude of times by multitudes of authors and is always disheartening.

The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shat preserve them from this generation for ever.” Psalm 12:6-7

Why God Was Expelled From School

May 28th, 2009

In 1962 the Supreme Court ruled it “unconstitutional” for prayers to be said in the public school system. In 1963 our Supreme Court ruled it “unconstitutional” for the Bible to be used in our public school system. Since then, the Ten Commandments and anything “religious”, have also been deemed “unconstitutional” for use in our public school system. The basis for all of these decisions has been the claim of defending the “separation of Church and State”.

The phrase “separation of Church and State” does not come from the Constitution, or the Declaration of Independence, or any other legal document. It originated in a personal letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Dansbury Baptist Association dated January 1, 1802. In this letter President Jefferson used the phrase “separation between Church and State”i to assure the Association that the Government would make no laws restricting their free exercise of religion. However, that is not the application made by the Supreme Court. Instead, they used that phrase for exactly the opposite purpose. So not only have they misinterpreted (and misapplied) the phrase, its “legal precedent” is a personal letter not a legal document!

Thomas Jefferson’s view of the part religion should play in education would more aptly be understood in light of the fact that in 1787, while he was serving in Congress, Congress passed the “Northwest Ordinance”, which Jefferson highly influenced. Article 3 of that “Ordinance” states: “Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged”.ii

That schools and religion were intertwined is an established fact of early America. Churches were schoolhouses, clergy were often the teachers, and the Bible was the main textbook. If “separation between Church and State” was a philosophy of early America, why did it take until 1962 for God (prayer, the Bible, etc.) to be expelled from school?

i Albert Ellery Bergh, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson (Washington, D.C.: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1904), Vol. XVI, pg. 282